There is still growing concern within the public about the effects of recombinant bovine growth hormone consumption. |
Bovine somatotropin and bovine growth hormone are both naturally-occurring hormones within the cow's normal bodily functions. In fact, it is secreted by the pituitary gland of animals, including humans, and helps in aiding normal growth, development, and even health maintenance. Because production has grown to be a larger feat and demand even greater, once it was discovered that injecting cows with growth hormone would increase milk production, it became acceptable and a normal practice. Initially extracted from cattle pituitary glands, after large amounts of research, the hormone became easier to produce in large quantities as well as cheaper and is to this day, utilized frequently within bovine production practices. In response to this rising concern from the public however, the FDA and NIH review panel released a statement that "milk and meat from cows supplemented with rBST is safe for human consumption" and backed their statement with research.
There is currently no data to suggest that these additional hormones, if ingested, can survive the digestive tract's harsh environment. In fact, oral toxicity studies done with rats demonstrated the inability of rbGH to remain active within their oral environments which consequently means it can not be absorbed into their system. However, there is evidence suggesting that even if BST is absorbed intact into the body, the growth hormone receptors present in the human's immune system would fail to recognize cow BST, and therefore would not produce effects in natural hormone balance.
Although research continues, there are certain challenges that arise in evaluating levels of additional hormone in meat and milk products. Currently, there are no processes available to properly determine the amount of hormone used for treatment remaining in meat and milk products because it is impossible to differentiate between naturally occurring hormones produced by the animal and those previously used to treat the animal. Nonetheless, concern although slightly alleviated for some, still continues within the general public in accordance with hormone treatment in cows.
Even initial to researching the rBGH, I
personally felt that hormones in my milk did not have to be a bad thing. FDA
regulation in the United States of America is very strong, and ensures public
safety. Also from past biology classes, I was aware when this controversy exhumed
that it was a naturally-occurring substance in the body that was critical to
normal growth, function, and health of the body. Nonetheless, my concern arose
directly from the administration of these drugs to cows to increase milk
production. Although the product was better for consumers and sufficing their
demand, what affects were there on the cow? Although the hormone itself is
naturally produced within the body, will the increased milk production effect their
hormonal sequences (negative/positive feedback) and disrupt their normal
levels?
(To Be Continued...)
"Why you don't want rBGH (rBST) in Milk- No More Hormones!"
(To Be Continued...)
Sources:
No comments:
Post a Comment